application of bland-altman method in comparing transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography for estimating prostate volume
Authors
abstract
background: estimating prostate volume using less invasive transabdominal ultrasonography (taus) instead of transrectal ultrasonography (trus) is of interest in terms of identifying their agreement level. previous reports on this subject, applied general correlation coefficient as the level of agreement. this study uses bland-altman method to quantify taus and trus agreement on estimating prostate volume. methods: total prostate gland volume of 40 patients with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia were measured using taus and trus. the study was carried out at the urology research center, razi hospital, guilan university of medical sciences (rasht, iran) from march to october 2010. both methods were performed in one session by the same experienced radiologist. data were analyzed using pearson correlation coefficient and bland-altman method. results: total prostate volume estimated by taus and trus were 50.30±23 and 50.73±24.6 ml, respectively. the limits of agreement for the total prostate volume were -6.86/9.84 that was larger than predefined clinical acceptable margin of 5 ml. conclusion: there is a lack of agreement between taus and trus for estimating the total prostate volume. it is not recommended to apply taus instead of trus for estimating prostate volume.
similar resources
Application of Bland-Altman Method in Comparing Transrectal and Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Estimating Prostate Volume
Background: Estimating prostate volume using less invasive transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS) instead of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is of interest in terms of identifying their agreement level. Previous reports on this subject, applied general correlation coefficient as the level of agreement. This study uses Bland-Altman method to quantify TAUS and TRUS agreement on estimating prost...
full textApplication of Bland-Altman Method in Comparing Transrectal and Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Estimating Prostate Volume
BACKGROUND Estimating prostate volume using less invasive transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS) instead of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is of interest in terms of identifying their agreement level. Previous reports on this subject, applied general correlation coefficient as the level of agreement. This study uses Bland-Altman method to quantify TAUS and TRUS agreement on estimating prosta...
full textComparison of Transabdominal and Transrectal Ultrasonography of the Prostate Gland in Dogs
Objective- To compare transabdominal (TA) and transrectal (TR) ultrasonography of the prostate gland. Design- Experimental study. Animals- 10 intact male dogs that required euthanasia for reasons other than prostatic disease. Procedures- Prostatic length (L), width (W) and height (H) were measured in T A (L1, W1 and H1) and TR (L2 and H2...
full textCorrelations between the Various Methods of Estimating Prostate Volume: Transabdominal, Transrectal, and Three-Dimensional US
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the correlations between prostate volumes estimated by transabdominal, transrectal, and three-dimensional US and the factors affecting the differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prostate volumes of 94 consecutive patients were measured by both transabdominal and transrectal US. Next, the prostate volumes of 58 other patients was measured by both transrectal and three-dim...
full textValidating the Bland-Altman Method of Agreement
Bland-Altman’s analysis and plot are the most common methods used to assess the relative agreement between two analytical methods that measure the continuous variables measured on the same scale. Many agreement studies have shown that using the t-test or the Pearson’s product-moment correlation is flawed when measuring the agreement or detecting the bias. Bland-Altman proposed graphical techniq...
full textUnderstanding Bland Altman analysis
In a contemporary clinical laboratory it is very common to have to assess the agreement between two quantitative methods of measurement. The correct statistical approach to assess this degree of agreement is not obvious. Correlation and regression studies are frequently proposed. However, correlation studies the relationship between one variable and another, not the differences, and it is not r...
full textMy Resources
Save resource for easier access later
Journal title:
iranian journal of medical sciencesجلد ۴۰، شماره ۱، صفحات ۳۴-۰
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023